Second, conspiracy is a covert activity. People do not usually enter into open illegal alliances. In the interest of security, a person can carry out their share of the conspiracy without even being informed of the identity of their co-conspirators. Since such an agreement can rarely be proved by direct evidence, it must be inferred from indications of cooperation between the defendants. What people do, of course, is proof of what`s in their minds. Since by broadening this principle, a person`s actions could draw a conclusion about what he is willing to do, it is fair to infer an agreement to participate in a conspiracy from the conduct of acts that fulfill his purpose. However, this rule of proof may obscure the fundamental principle that a conspiracy is not proven without proof of an agreement. Conspiracy is not just a concordance of wills, it is an agreement that flows from an agreement. Even if a conspiracy between two parties is demonstrated, any act of a third party that contributes to the achievement of the purpose of the conspiracy is not a sufficient basis to prove its consent to this agreement. However, the traditional right of conspiracy is insufficient when applied to criminal organizations pursuing very different objectives from apparently unrelated persons. That is why Congress passed the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act of 1970 [RICO] to address the growing problem of organized crime (18 U.S.C§ 1961-1968 (1999)). This law facilitates the continuation of conspiracies by changing the traditional idea of a conspiratorial purpose. Instead of proving that each accused conspired to commit a particular crime or crime — an extremely difficult task in the context of a large and vast criminal organization — the prosecution simply needs to show that each defendant conspired to promote the enterprise through his or her individual model of criminal activity.
No matter how diverse the objectives of a large criminal organization, there is only one objective: to foster the promotion of the enterprise. A Plea Bargain (including Plea Agreement or Plea Deal) is any agreement in criminal proceedings between the prosecutor and the accused, in which the accused agrees to plead guilty or plead against a concession by the prosecutor to a given charge. . . .